Recommendations are made for modifying some of the criteria to improve reliability where excellence was not reached. It is con-cluded that both inter and intra-rater reliability of tests in The Foundation Matrix are acceptable when rated by experienced therapists. Cohen’s Kappa values for inter-rater reliability were 0.0-1.0 intra-rater 0.6-1.0 for Rater 1 -0.1-1.0 for Rater 2 and -0.1-1 for real-time versus video. Equipment: Stopwatch, Standard Chair, Measured distance. Time to complete TUG test: Observe the patients postural stability, gait, stride length, and. Up and Go (TUG) test is a common tool for fall risk assessment. Stop the timer when the patient has sat back down in the chair. Reliability for individual components of each test was more variable: inter-rater, 68-100% intra-rater, 88-100% Rater 1, 75-100% Rater 2 and real-time versus video 31-100%. Description: Measure of function with correlates to balance and fall risk. Fall is a leading cause of death which suffers the elderly and society. Intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) were excellent between raters (0.81) and within raters (Rater 1, 0.96 Rater 2, 0.88) but poor for real-time versus video (0.23). Overall test percentage agreement was 87% for inter-rater reliability 98% Rater 1, 94% Rater 2 for test re-test reliability and 75% for real-time versus video. Predicting the Probability for Falls in CommunityDwelling Older Adults Using the Timed Up & Go Test. The therapists observed participants real-time and tests were recorded on video to enable repeated ratings four months later to examine intra-rater reliability (videos rated two weeks apart). Shumway Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Movement evaluation criteria for each test were rated as pass or fail. ![]() Twenty participants were screened by two experienced musculoskeletal therapists using nine tests to assess the ability to control movement during specific tasks. This study aimed to determine the intra-rater test re-test and inter-rater reliability of tests from a component of The Perfor-mance Matrix, The Foundation Matrix. As with any new method of objective testing, it is fundamental to establish whether the same results can be reproduced between examiners and by the same examiner on consecutive occasions. The subject wears their regular footwear and uses their customary walking aid (if necessary). The TUG requires participants to stand from a seated position, walk a 3 metre distance at a normal pace, turn around, walk back, and sit in the same seated position. ![]() With the increasing need to identify potential injury with greater accuracy, a new risk assessment process has been produced The Performance Matrix (battery of movement control tests). Clinical tests such as the Berg Balance Scale, the Tinetti Mobility Test, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test have been extensively used. This test is a modified, timed version of the Get Up-and-Go (GUG) test. Abstract Pre-season screening is well established within the sporting arena, and aims to enhance performance and reduce injury risk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |